economics tuition trial class singapore Tag

Why is economic growth important to an economy?

The greatest benefit of economic growth is a rise in the living standards. This is provided economic growth exceeds population growth, real GDP per capita will rise  a higher level of consumption of goods and services.

Rapid economic growth rate makes it easier to redistribute income to the poor (lower income group). When there is economic growth  income rises, the government can redistribute income from the upper income group to the lower income group without the need to raise tax rates, i.e. without penalising the
high income earners  the rich pays more taxes. In addition, economic growth  firms’ profit level rises  pays more corporate tax  a positive effect on government finances  boosting tax revenues and providing the government with extra funds to spent on programmes to alleviate poverty and close the income gap between the rich and poor.

 

Join JC Economics Education Centre to improve your results now!

Cigarettes is a type of demerit good as it exhibits negative externalities from consumption. They are deemed to be socially undesirable. Negative externalities refer to incidental costs to third parties that are not taken into account by those who are involved in the activity.

A smoker will only take into account his private costs (price of the packet of cigarettes and own smoking-related health problems) and private benefits (satisfaction derived from smoking).

However, he does not consider the negative externalities that would be generated by his smoking (smoking-related health problems on passive smokers, costs incurred to society for having to provide healthcare for smoking-related health problems as well as clearing and maintenance costs for the litter).

The social cost from undertaking the activity is the private cost faced by the smoker as well as external costs accruing to third parties. Negative externalities will lead to divergence of private cost and social cost. With the presence of negative externalities, social cost will be greater than private cost.

Market failure is likely to exist because the negative externality is underpriced by the price mechanism. If cigarettes were provided through the free market, social costs of smoking exceed the private costs. Private optimum occurs at Qe where PMB (the benefit to the individuals of smoking the last unit of cigarette) equals PMC (the cost to the individual of smoking the last unit of cigarette).

The socially efficient level is where SMC=SMB i.e. at output Qs. Therefore, there are too many scare resources devoted to the consumption of cigarettes. There will be over-consumption of cigarettes because society values an extra unit of cigarette less than what it would cost society to produce it. Shaded area represents the welfare loss to society as a result of this over-allocation of resources. Society as a whole could be made better off if the current level of cigarettes were reduced to socially efficient level. (Qs)

Learn more from Anthony Fok by attending his economics tuition classes now!

Refer to the news article: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/single-use-plastic-bags-better-for-environment-13282250

Economics Tuition Discussion Topic: Explain why plastic carriers are a source of market failure.

  • Plastic carriers are typically non-biodegradable. The usage of plastic carriers is considered an activity that generates negative externalities, especially when carriers are used only once. Negative externalities arising from an economic activity are the incidental costs to third parties that are not taken into account by those who undertake the activity.
  • In deciding whether to accept and use an additional plastic carrier, such as for the purpose of containing goods he purchased, an individual will only take into account his private marginal cost and private marginal benefit. His private benefits include the convenience derived from the use of a light-weight carrier which is also water-proof. His private costs include the effort taken to dispose of the carrier after use.
  • Typically, many shoppers do not incur extra cost for the use of plastic carriers as many shops do not explicitly charge for carriers.
  • However, this individual does not consider the negative externalities that would be generated by the use of plastic carriers – the mess in generated in public areas due to irresponsible disposal of such carriers that other citizens have to endure; toxins entering the atmosphere when the plastic carriers are incinerated which may be inhaled by citizens. These are not taken into consideration by the individual using the carriers.

 

Explain over-allocation of resources in the case of excessive usage of plastic carriers

  • Based on the price mechanism, the market equilibrium level of plastic carrier usage is where private marginal cost (PMC) equates to the private marginal benefit (PMB). Individuals who use the carriers do not take into account the negative externalities arising from their usage.
  • Due to the presence of negative externalities as explained above, the social marginal cost (SMC) is greater than PMC at the market equilibrium level of plastic carrier usage. As such, at the market equilibrium, society values the usage of a carrier less than what it would cost to society. The socially efficient level of plastic carrier usage is where social marginal benefit equates to SMC i.e. the external costs are taken into account. The price mechanism thus over-allocates resources to the usage plastic carriers i.e. there is over-usage of plastic carriers whereby the market equilibrium level of plastic carrier usage exceed the socially efficient level.
  • This over-usage of plastic carriers leads to problems with waste management and contamination of the atmosphere, resulting in a loss of welfare to society, otherwise known as deadweight loss.

Deflation is the sustained fall in general price level. Government will be more concerned with deflation if the deflation is caused by a fall in aggregate demand during economic recessions.

For Singapore, a worldwide recession is likely to cause a fall in exports and hence a fall in in aggregate demand. This will result in a leftward shift in the AD causing the general price level to fall and also a fall in the real GDP. As demand for goods and services fall, firms will cut back on their production and this will lead to a fall in the demand for labour. Producers will start to retrench workers and this will lead to a rise in cyclical unemployment. To the producers, lower prices also cause uncertainties to the firms and firms will start hold back on investment resulting in a further fall in aggregate demand and higher unemployment.

Consumers, on the other, will benefit from the lower prices in the short run. Lower prices will allow consumers to buy more goods and services. There will be redistribution of income caused by a fall in general price level. To the saver, their savings will also increase in real value. This will increase their material standard of living. Fixed income earners will now enjoy higher real income and hence higher purchasing power to consume.

Borrowers, on the other hand, will lose out as they have to repay their loans that have an increasing real value. However, in the long run, if prices continue to fall, consumers will hold back their consumption in anticipation of further fall in prices. This will result in firms cutting back on production and hence a fall in AD which results in higher unemployment. With lower or no income, consumers will cut back on consumption and this will result in a deflationary spiral which worsens the country’s economic growth and rising unemployment, thus penalizing consumers.

To the government, lower prices creates uncertainties and will affect consumers and investors’ confidence hence affecting the government’s ability to achieve macroeconomic objectives such as sustained economic growth and low unemployment. Foreign firms are less willing to invest in the country given the bleak outlook and this will affect the country’s capital account and balance of payments. Government also collects less tax revenue with falling incomes and profits and spend more on unemployment or welfare benefits which may end up worsening the budget balance. Lower tax revenue will also mean less expenditure on merit and public goods which will affect the citizens’ standard of living.

In conclusion, it is important for the government to identify the cause of deflation and assess the impact on the economy and finally implement appropriate policies to manage the economy when faced with deflation.